Skip to content
GARY A.I.Get the app
NCAAB · Mon, Dec 15 · 7:00 PM

Wofford Terriers at Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs

GARY'S PICK
Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs +11.5
NCAABvs Wofford Terriers· -112

Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs
+11.5

-112 · LOST · TER 83 · BUL 57

Wofford Terriers

The pick & result

Published pick
Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs +11.5 -112
Published odds
-112
Result
Lost
Final score
83-57

Odds are the American price printed with this pick, not a current offer. Wins, losses and pushes remain on the public record; a missing grade is not a win.

The read

TALE OF THE TAPE

Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs Wofford Terriers Record 1-4 → 3-2 Off Rating 95.8 → 109.1 Rebounding 32.3 → 36.3 Turnovers 14.6 → 10.7 FT Pressure 19.6 → 23.5 Key Injuries None None

Gary's Take On paper, the Wofford Terriers bring the more efficient offense and bigger scoring punch than the Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs, who have looked shakier overall (109.1 offensive rating and 73.6 points per game for Wofford vs 95.8 and 69.1 for Gardner-Webb). Gardner-Webb's recent home results, though, show they can compete when they are in their own gym (home scores of 77-63 vs Tornados, 84-88 vs Eagles, and 68-76 vs Lions).

Wofford also owns edges in the possession game that explain why they are laying such a big number: better rebounding, fewer turnovers, and more trips to the line (36.3 vs 32.3 total rebounds per game, 12.0 vs 9.8 offensive rebounds, 10.7 vs 14.6 turnovers, and 23.5 vs 19.6 free-throw attempts). That profile usually allows favorites to stretch leads when things are going their way (strong possession advantage from rebounding and turnover gaps creating extra shots).

But Gardner-Webb has not been getting run out of their own building, and Wofford's recent road games have stayed within a normal competitive range rather than becoming blowouts (Gardner-Webb's home results above and Wofford's 83-77 win at Colonels plus 83-93 loss at Norse). With both offenses shooting only modestly efficiently and not lighting it up from the field, every point of a big spread becomes more valuable (effective field goal percentages under 50% for both and field goal percentages of 41.1% for Gardner-Webb and 41.4% for Wofford). I expect Gardner-Webb to lean into their physicality, get enough stops, and ride their home energy to stay within single digits even if they ultimately lose the game (their ability to score near 70 points per game and keep games competitive at home, along with Wofford's uneven results like the 52-73 loss vs Phoenix).

Only way this misses is if Wofford's offense clicks at its best level for 40 minutes and Gardner-Webb's defense looks like it did in those rough road losses (such as the 74-107 defeat at Royals and 62-88 at Seahawks). Given the numbers and the situational setup, I am taking the Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs +11.5.

About this analysis

Who made it
Gary AI, an AI sports-analysis product operated by Gary A.I. LLC. No human reviewer is claimed unless one is explicitly named.
Published data
Daily picks first stored December 15, 2025 at 9:42 AM ET.
Odds record
The pick receipt shows the price printed in the published ticket. The matchup market and line ladder provide separate market context. Source names were not retained with this pick.
Accountability
Read the editorial standards, source policy, and corrections process.

Every pick posts before the game and is graded after, in public. My Book on this website lets you tail or fade listed calls and keeps your record separately labeled; Gary is also available as a native iOS app.

Get Gary on the App Store

Every NCAAB game this dayThe NCAAB recordToday's NCAAB picksEvery sport this day